Restaurant Online Ordering Systems: A Guide
A restaurant’s own online ordering system, separate from third-party delivery apps, lets operators avoid commission fees and own the guest relationship directly.
First-Party vs. Third-Party Ordering
A restaurant-owned ordering system avoids the 15-30% commission fees typical of third-party delivery platforms, though it requires the restaurant to handle its own marketing and, often, delivery logistics.
- First-party ordering: no commission, requires own marketing
- Third-party platforms: built-in audience, high commission
- Hybrid approach: both channels, different pricing strategies
- White-label ordering apps: branded experience, moderate cost
Key Features for a Restaurant Ordering System
Menu synchronization with the POS, mobile-friendly checkout, and saved payment options for repeat guests are core features that drive conversion on a first-party ordering platform.
Driving Traffic to First-Party Ordering
QR codes on receipts, loyalty program incentives, and social media promotion are common tactics restaurants use to shift order volume away from commission-heavy third-party apps.
First-Party vs. Third-Party Ordering
| Factor | First-Party | Third-Party |
|---|---|---|
| Commission fees | None or low | Often 15-30% |
| Built-in audience | No, requires own marketing | Yes |
| Guest data ownership | Full | Limited or none |
